<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hard Times</title>
	<atom:link href="http://librarygarden.net/2010/07/06/hard-times/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://librarygarden.net/2010/07/06/hard-times/</link>
	<description>An ongoing conversation among librarians with differing perspectives (public, academic, school, consortial, youth) but one shared goal: ensuring the health and relevance of libraries. [insert your own gardening metaphor here]</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 18:44:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia Skinner</title>
		<link>http://librarygarden.net/2010/07/06/hard-times/#comment-6038</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Julia Skinner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Oct 2010 17:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://librarygarden.net/?p=2996#comment-6038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a great post! I think so many libraries just assume that policy is there, and current, and in the hands of the people it needs to be, but it really is a great protection. It makes me think of the libraries I studied in WWI--unfortunately the few bits of policy I saw were updates to how the library was funded, etc. but I never did get to see what their policies were in regards to collections. It would be a pretty cool area to explore though. 
I&#039;m curious when you talk about the increase in librarians quietly removing items that might raise a fuss, do you know of any studies that talk about this in the present day? It would be neat to look at to get a sense of how much this practice increases during a recession. I also didn&#039;t make the connection that you were also at the PhD fair until just now! That was one of my favorite parts of ALA.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great post! I think so many libraries just assume that policy is there, and current, and in the hands of the people it needs to be, but it really is a great protection. It makes me think of the libraries I studied in WWI&#8211;unfortunately the few bits of policy I saw were updates to how the library was funded, etc. but I never did get to see what their policies were in regards to collections. It would be a pretty cool area to explore though.<br />
I&#8217;m curious when you talk about the increase in librarians quietly removing items that might raise a fuss, do you know of any studies that talk about this in the present day? It would be neat to look at to get a sense of how much this practice increases during a recession. I also didn&#8217;t make the connection that you were also at the PhD fair until just now! That was one of my favorite parts of ALA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
