<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: At what point do we stop investing in a format?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://librarygarden.net/2009/09/30/at-what-point-do-we-stop-investing-in-a-format/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://librarygarden.net/2009/09/30/at-what-point-do-we-stop-investing-in-a-format/</link>
	<description>An ongoing conversation among librarians with differing perspectives (public, academic, school, consortial, youth) but one shared goal: ensuring the health and relevance of libraries. [insert your own gardening metaphor here]</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 18:36:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RedheadFangirl</title>
		<link>http://librarygarden.net/2009/09/30/at-what-point-do-we-stop-investing-in-a-format/#comment-5628</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RedheadFangirl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 18:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://librarygarden.net/?p=2384#comment-5628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[and to add to the mix, Wired 10/09 has an article about Netflix creating a box that &quot;lets you watch every show and movie ever made- instantly&quot;; a sleek black box, size of a paperback, with a few jacks in back.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and to add to the mix, Wired 10/09 has an article about Netflix creating a box that &#8220;lets you watch every show and movie ever made- instantly&#8221;; a sleek black box, size of a paperback, with a few jacks in back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler</title>
		<link>http://librarygarden.net/2009/09/30/at-what-point-do-we-stop-investing-in-a-format/#comment-5626</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tyler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://librarygarden.net/?p=2384#comment-5626</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey Walt, 

Must&#039;ve been asleep at the typing wheel there.  Thanks for pointing them out, I believe I got all the corrections made now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Walt, </p>
<p>Must&#8217;ve been asleep at the typing wheel there.  Thanks for pointing them out, I believe I got all the corrections made now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jen Hinderer</title>
		<link>http://librarygarden.net/2009/09/30/at-what-point-do-we-stop-investing-in-a-format/#comment-5625</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jen Hinderer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://librarygarden.net/?p=2384#comment-5625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Based on my observation of  college and HS aged kids: disc technology is doomed, forget about 5 years. Us &quot;old&quot; folks will still hang on to it, so libraries will still have to carry it, but no one under the age of 20 that I know is at ALL interested in discs. They are a last resort when there are no other options available. BluRay won&#039;t dominate because discs will be irrelevant. Listen to the salesperson and buy a PS3: at least it will still play games. 

Kind of like this old lady librarian and her audiobooks: if a title can&#039;t be downloaded, or isn&#039;t at least available on a Playway I&#039;m not interested.  BUT my library still has audiocassettes.  Because public libraries can&#039;t leave our patrons behind while trying to lead them along into the future.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Based on my observation of  college and HS aged kids: disc technology is doomed, forget about 5 years. Us &#8220;old&#8221; folks will still hang on to it, so libraries will still have to carry it, but no one under the age of 20 that I know is at ALL interested in discs. They are a last resort when there are no other options available. BluRay won&#8217;t dominate because discs will be irrelevant. Listen to the salesperson and buy a PS3: at least it will still play games. </p>
<p>Kind of like this old lady librarian and her audiobooks: if a title can&#8217;t be downloaded, or isn&#8217;t at least available on a Playway I&#8217;m not interested.  BUT my library still has audiocassettes.  Because public libraries can&#8217;t leave our patrons behind while trying to lead them along into the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: waltcrawford</title>
		<link>http://librarygarden.net/2009/09/30/at-what-point-do-we-stop-investing-in-a-format/#comment-5622</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[waltcrawford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://librarygarden.net/?p=2384#comment-5622</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting overall discussion, but a couple of points:

1. It&#039;s Blu-ray. No e. 

2. It took CDs a decade to become the dominant audio format, despite being vastly superior to predecessors in convenience and sound quality. Blu-ray offers no edge in convenience...and, realistically, it&#039;s only been a &quot;single choice&quot; for 18 months. So saying &quot;it&#039;s not going to happen because it hasn&#039;t happened&quot; is a bit premature. (That said, I doubt it will *ever* become dominant--but I think it&#039;s got a healthy life ahead of it.)

3. HD downloads mostly aren&#039;t--they may be sent as HD formats, but with so much data compression that they&#039;re not anywhere near Blu-ray/broadcast HD quality. 

As to the real question: My answer, other than archival purposes, would be &quot;when it&#039;s no longer circulating and when better formats handle all your patrons&#039; needs.&quot; But of course I&#039;m not in a library.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting overall discussion, but a couple of points:</p>
<p>1. It&#8217;s Blu-ray. No e. </p>
<p>2. It took CDs a decade to become the dominant audio format, despite being vastly superior to predecessors in convenience and sound quality. Blu-ray offers no edge in convenience&#8230;and, realistically, it&#8217;s only been a &#8220;single choice&#8221; for 18 months. So saying &#8220;it&#8217;s not going to happen because it hasn&#8217;t happened&#8221; is a bit premature. (That said, I doubt it will *ever* become dominant&#8211;but I think it&#8217;s got a healthy life ahead of it.)</p>
<p>3. HD downloads mostly aren&#8217;t&#8211;they may be sent as HD formats, but with so much data compression that they&#8217;re not anywhere near Blu-ray/broadcast HD quality. </p>
<p>As to the real question: My answer, other than archival purposes, would be &#8220;when it&#8217;s no longer circulating and when better formats handle all your patrons&#8217; needs.&#8221; But of course I&#8217;m not in a library.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

