Comments on: A tempest has been brewing… AKA, yet even more on the scrotum story

By: K.G. Schneider

K.G. Schneider — Thu, 22 Feb 2007 02:14:00 +0000

Hey, Pete, tell them how you really feel! This was great. Bravo bravo bravo. What a piece of piffle from the Times.

By: Janie L. Hermann

Janie L. Hermann — Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:02:00 +0000

I give this post 2 thumbs up! I think Pete needs to do more posting between the hours of midnight and 6:00. Go with it Pete and let your inner snark shine.

By: Liz B

Liz B — Wed, 21 Feb 2007 16:41:00 +0000

I am disgusted with the way that the NYT reported the original story & now it’s follow up. “Lazy” is being kind; this shows that those at the paper may believe themeselves “well read” and may indeed be “well read”; yet they fail miserably when it comes to the ability to investigate, report, and fact check something in a professional manner.

By: Peter Bromberg

Peter Bromberg — Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:18:00 +0000

Thanks Arlen for your kind, clean words Yes, it really was 2:45. I was/am a bit under the weather and couldn’t sleep. I guess my snark filter is disabled between midnight and 6:00 am!

By: Arlen

Arlen — Wed, 21 Feb 2007 13:07:00 +0000

Peter: Your future is in satiric writing! (Not Satanic; although, I really don’t know you that well…) If Balzac:ball sac and “Well anyway Lady, thanks for … not using the word “shhhh” anywhere in the (final draft) of the editorial,” are any indication of your witty repartee (is ‘witty repartee’ redundant?), then I can’t wait to read something you write that’s posted at a decent hour! (Was it really 2:45 AM?) Yours, Arlen